Researching exactly what goes
into our effluent has become his passion. Jones spends much of his time
trawling the internet and reading books and says he has uncovered evidence
proving waste water is too contaminated to recycle. Most startling of his claims is
that dangerous chemicals in our sewage will feminise men and shrink their
genitals. The evidence can be found in overseas studies on the effects of
synthetic hormones in polluted water that have shrunk alligator penises in
Florida and affected reproduction in rainbow trout and carp in Wales and
England, he claims. Jones also believes there is a
conspiracy between environment groups, government and the water industry
to hide the truth from the public about the risks of recycled water.
"I am a licensed plumber and
drainer and I know what goes into a sewer," says Jones, who says treated
water should only be used to flush toilets but for no other domestic
purpose, nor for agriculture, industry, or irrigation of sporting ovals.
Not even for washing the car. The Sunshine Coast plumber - who
has no scientific or water treatment expertise - represents the extreme
end of anti-recycling sentiment that has toppled more than one
government's plans, both here and overseas, to supplement water sources
with treated effluent. According to water experts,
people should ask questions about the safety of any treated effluent being
injected back into a city or town's water system. They also say no major
health risks have arisen from the use of recycled water overseas although
that should not lead water authorities or governments to be complacent
about treatment processes. However, governments ignore the
Joneses of the world at their peril. Their message that recycled water
poses long-term health risks taps into our fears of contaminated water.
Modern treatment systems are designed to remove contaminates, but for some
people no amount of information about the safety of that process can
overcome what academics call the yuk factor. As the NSW Government's research
revealed, the public's long-held resistance to using recycled water
manifests as a "psychological barrier" thrown up by a feeling of disgust.
Some people can't move beyond the mental image of raw sewage even when
they know sewage is no longer present in the water that is produced by
sophisticated treatment plants. For others there's a general sense that
the water is "dirty" and could lead to illness and disease, according to
work done last year by the Australian Water Association and the CSIRO.
It doesn't help when politicians,
both for and against recycling water, confuse the debate by suggesting
people will be drinking human waste. "Surely we have to accept we have
to drink our own excrement," was how Chris Harris, a Sydney City
councillor and a member of the NSW Greens, phrased it at a recent council
meeting convened to discuss Sydney's water shortage. Governments only need look at
Jones's track record to realise the yuk factor is alive and well in
Australia. Over the past decade the plumber
from Buddina has helped scuttle plans by three Queensland councils to
recycle water. Now he has his sights set on Toowoomba, where he has
rallied residents to oppose the council's ambitious plans to serve up
recycled water to its residents in the face of a dire water shortage.
It is an emotive issue that
cannot be easily resolved by facts and figures, says the University of
NSW's Associate Professor Greg Leslie, who has worked with Orange County
in the US and the Singapore Government on water treatment plants.
"The water is safe," Leslie told
the Sydney Morning Herald. "I would have no problems with my five-year-old
drinking the water from the type of plant Toowoomba is proposing."
Leslie, who, along with other
water experts, has been helping Toowoomba Council with its water treatment
proposal, says the chances of becoming ill from water recycled to drinking
level standards is minuscule. "You have more chance of being
struck by lightning or of winning the lottery," he says, adding that no
government authority enters into the issue lightly. "What we are dealing with is a
cultural conditioning that has been traced back to every anthropological
group to separate your waste from your clean food and water. "We teach our children to wash
their hands after they go to the toilet. It has been programmed into us by
our parents and we did it because it was a way of keeping us healthy," he
says. However, the truth, he says, is
that modern treatment processes remove so much material from effluent that
it can no longer be identified as waste water. The deputy director for the
Centre for Water and Waste Technology at NSW University, Professor Nick
Ashbolt, says it is reasonable to raise concerns about treated water but
points out some Australians already drink recycled water. In NSW, for example, tertiary
treated effluent from nine Sydney Water treatment plants is discharged
into the Hawkesbury-Nepean river system, upstream of the North Richmond
water filtration plant. The plant treats up to 50
megalitres of water a day from the river that is used by people in the
Hawkesbury region including Windsor and Richmond and towards the Blue
Mountains as far as Kurrajong. "Despite concerns about gender
bending [from chemicals in water] there is no evidence of that being
associated with what people are drinking," says Ashbolt. "It is easy to be
alarmist and to raise these concerns." A senior research scientist and
microbiologist with the CSIRO's land and water division, Dr Simon Toze,
agrees. His own searches of international
literature on water re-use found no evidence people became sick from using
water from properly controlled treatment plants. Exhaustive
epidemiological studies done in four countries where recycled water is
drunk have found no risk of infection from pathogens. "You have a better chance of
catching an infection from a day-care centre or a swimming pool than from
a properly controlled and properly run reclaimed water system," he says.
Toze says many of the studies
about the lack of social acceptance of recycled water show the public's
decision comes down to trust. "I know the technology works but
I have to prove to people that it can work. The worst thing that could
happen is if we ask people to let us prove to them it works, that they
won't let us run a pilot project." That trust was sorely tested in
the late 1990s when a potentially lethal parasite, Cryptosporidium parvum,
invaded Sydney's dams and water pipes. For weeks, the city's residents
were forced to boil their water although there was no evidence of anyone
getting sick, which aroused suspicion about false test readings.
Disputes between Sydney Water and
the state health department about what to tell the public, and secret
contracts between the water authority and the then operators of the
Prospect water treatment plant, raised questions about whether money and
power were being put ahead of public safety. Which leads us back to Toowoomba.
A local resident and past
president of the Toowoomba chamber of commerce, Rosemary Morley, is angry
the council has not consulted locals about its water recycling plans.
So convinced was she by Jones
that such a plan would put people at risk, she set up a local branch of
Citizens Against Drinking Sewage and invited him to speak at a public
meeting. No Toowoomba councillors, council
staff or independent water experts were invited to address the estimated
500 people who turned up to the Centenary Heights school hall. Asked why she places so much
trust in a man with no technical or academic expertise in water treatment,
or recycling, Morley says Jones is an "ordinary man" just like Toowoomba
residents. "We are ordinary people and if
you can't convince us it will be safe...we are not prepared to make a
mistake," says Morley, who adds she is not concerned enough about the
water shortage to go down the water recycling track. Nor does she trust
assurances from scientists. "There is a big leap of faith to
be made," says Morley. "People are in the grip of hysteria...We have a
right to be sceptical...people are not prepared to pay the price."
SYDNEY:
Australian Laurie Jones knows a thing or two about sewage. The plumber,
drainer and gas fitter has been standing in it, literally, for
years.
Source: www.stuff.co.nz
- CBCSD and Members Participated and Suggested on the Project for Technical Regulation on Low-carbon Pilot Community
- CBCSD and Members Participated in the APEC Cooperation Network Construction Forum of Green Supply Chain
- Calculation Method of CO2 Emissions in Petroleum and Natural Gas Exploitation Enterprises & Calculation Method of CO2 Emissions in Water Network of Chemical Enterprises
- CBCSD Attended the Workshop for Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development and Delivered Introductions
- WBCSD: Tackling the Challenge, How to Make Informed Choices on Forest Product?
- The National New-Type Urbanization Plan Released, Board Members of CBCSD Help the Sustainable Development of Cities
- Board members of CBCSD Actively Participated in the Carbon Trading and International Climate Change Process
- Two industrial Standards Compiled by CBCSD Passed Examination
- Widespread Use of the Achievements Businesses Energy Saving and Greenhouse Gas Management
- CBCSD held Chemical industry enterprise value chain (range 3) greenhouse gas emissions, accounting and reporting guidelines