2005 was a             busy year in the world of waste and recycling, as industry geared up             for the arrival of Europe's new WEEE regs and their enormous impact,             PFI waste contracts mushroomed in the UK and the issue of illegal             waste exports refused to go away. 
                            Shipbreakers             in Bangladesh. picture courtesy of Greenpeace.  As seemed to be the case across the board in the             environmental sector, the year began with light apparently visible             at the end of the tunnel and a raft of positive legislation on the             horizon. 
  And, again mirroring developments elsewhere, by the             time we were ringing in the New Year much of it had fallen by the             wayside. 
  The long-anticipated Waste Electrical and             Electronic Equipment (WEEE) regulations are a case in point.             
  The European regulations will control the disposal of             e-waste and see the introduction of a 'producer pays' principle and             while it is generally accepted they will benefit the environment,             and the consultants who will advise industry on how to comply, fears             have been raised by manufacturers that they would struggle to be             ready in the timescale originally sketched out . 
  An obliging DTI has put back the date             for the introduction of the regulations with reassuring regularity             and wound up the year with yet             another announcement that industry would be given a further period             of grace to prepare for WEEE. 
  In the UK 2005 was the rise of             the PFI contract, with rivals bidding for lucrative, lengthy deals             to service waste authorities up and down the country. 
  Many             of the larger contracts have demanded considerable capital             investment but the payback and promise of a guaranteed customer for             years to come have meant they have nevertheless been a very             attractive prospect for the big players in the waste and recycling             field. 
  The biggest PFI contract yet, to work with the             Greater Manchester Waste Disposal Authority, is worth an estimated             £4 billion and highlighted the growing trend for consortium bidding,             usually combining expertise in construction of facilities, their             operation once complete and the structure of the PFI agreements             themselves . 
  The arrival of             the Clean Neighbourhoods Act again promised new powers for British             councils keen to tackle eco-crime (see related story )             but how widely they will be enforced remains to be seen. 
  If             nothing else the law looks set to target professional fly tippers             and make householders think twice before using their services             . 
  While many local             authorities may have been revelling in their new powers, there was             one which was still having to fight for more clout when it came to             managing waste in its area. 
  The Greater London Authority and             mayor Ken Livingstone have been arguing the case for a Single Waste             Authority for the city, a prickly subject which has sparked a feisty             reaction from both sides of the fence. 
  Existing waste             managers have argued the scale of the project and differing needs of             the city's borough would make it an unworkable and costly folly             while powerful supporters have             stressed a holistic approach can make the city more efficient             . 
  The fate of our waste was             catapulted into the limelight towards the end of the year, as the             BBC broadcast a television documentary portraying the export of             recyclables as the industry's dirty little secret. 
  While the             piece was criticised for inaccuracies and failing to paint a             complete picture, it did provide a valuable service in rekindling             the debate over whether it is acceptable to ship waste to the Far             East under the banner of sustainability or whether 'recycling' is             being used as a flag of convenience and large quantities are burned             or landfilled. 
  It has also been a year where the ongoing             problems of 'ghost ships' and their eventual recycling at the             notoriously dangerous breaking yards of Indo-China has captured the             headlines. 
  Impending changes in regulations banning the             building of more single-hulled tankers look set to create a surge of             ageing hulks heading east for scrapping, and promises from the IMO             of a Green Passport - a document detailing what a ship is made of             and how best to dismantle it and dispose of its parts - have             received a lukewarm response from environmentalists. 
  2005             has also been a year peppered with human tragedy at England's             recycling plants, with several deaths due to industrial accidents             showing it is not just the developing world that needs to tighten up             its health and safety procedures in the waste management sector              |          Source: edie newsroom  | 
      
  |